Tolman v. Tolman

113 N.E. 180, 224 Mass. 501, 1916 Mass. LEXIS 1124
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJune 21, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 113 N.E. 180 (Tolman v. Tolman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tolman v. Tolman, 113 N.E. 180, 224 Mass. 501, 1916 Mass. LEXIS 1124 (Mass. 1916).

Opinion

Loring, J.

The decree in question contains this recital: "the plaintiff and the defendant Bradshaw S. Tohnan severally waiving their rights to appeal therefrom.” That recital brings that decree within the provision of R. L. c. 159, §34. A party to such a decree has caused an entry of his waiver of an appeal to be made on the docket within the provisions of that act. From such a decree there is no appeal. Winchester v. Winchester, 121 Mass. 127. See also in this connection Washington National Bank v. Williams, 188 Mass. 103.

It follows that the attachment had expired when execution was taken out more than thirty days after the date of the decree. Pub. Sts. c. 161, §53. R. L. c. 167, § 56.

We find nothing in the cases relied on by the petitioner requiring special notice.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forrey v. Dedham Taxi, Inc.
473 N.E.2d 726 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1985)
Olsson v. Waite
368 N.E.2d 1194 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1977)
Ellefsen v. MacCormac
14 Mass. App. Dec. 11 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1957)
Horn v. Hitchcock
127 N.E.2d 482 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1955)
Moseley v. Moseley
132 N.E. 417 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 N.E. 180, 224 Mass. 501, 1916 Mass. LEXIS 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tolman-v-tolman-mass-1916.