Tolman v. Gillespie

166 A.D. 899

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without passing upon the validity of the assessments, and on authority of Morgan v. Fullerton (9 App. Div. 233, 235), as to the proper method of trial of that question. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tolman v. Gillespie, 166 A.D. 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

166 A.D. 899 (Tolman v. Gillespie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan v. Fullerton
9 A.D. 233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)