Tollis v. New York, Hew Haven & Hartford Railroad
This text of 282 A.D. 885 (Tollis v. New York, Hew Haven & Hartford Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order, on reargument, as denied their application to vacate a notice served by defendant for the examination of the plaintiffs before trial, and as denied their application for a direction therein that a discovery and inspection of defendant’s records and an examination before trial of defendant by plaintiffs, granted by such order, should precede the examination of plaintiffs by defendant. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Ho opinion. Holán, P. J., Adel,
MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 958.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 885, 124 N.Y.S.2d 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tollis-v-new-york-hew-haven-hartford-railroad-nyappdiv-1953.