Tollis v. New York, Hew Haven & Hartford Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tollis v. New York, Hew Haven & Hartford Railroad

282 A.D. 885, 124 N.Y.S.2d 847

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 13, 1953·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order, on reargument, as denied their application to vacate a notice served by defendant for the examination of the plaintiffs before trial, and as denied their application for a direction therein that a discovery and inspection of defendant’s records and an examination before trial of defendant by plaintiffs, granted by such order, should precede the examination of plaintiffs by defendant. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Ho opinion. Holán, P. J., Adel,

MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 958.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order, on reargument, as denied their application to vacate a notice served by defendant for the examination of the plaintiffs before trial, and as denied their application for a direction therein that a discovery and inspection of defendant’s records and an examination before trial of defendant by plaintiffs, granted by such order, should precede the examination of plaintiffs by defendant. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Ho opinion. Holán, P. J., Adel,

MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 958.]

Tollis v. New York, Hew Haven & Hartford Railroad, 282 A.D. 885, 124 N.Y.S.2d 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

282 A.D. 885 (Tollis v. New York, Hew Haven & Hartford Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related