Tollefson v. Anderson & Fercho, PLLP
This text of 2019 ND 32 (Tollefson v. Anderson & Fercho, PLLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[¶1] In December 2017, Jon Tollefson filed a complaint alleging various causes of action including defamation and unpaid wages related to his termination from employment with Haga Kommer Ltd. All claims, aside from defamation and unpaid wages, were dismissed for failure to state a claim. In July 2018, the district court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the defamation and unpaid wages claims. The district court found Tollefson's claims to be frivolous under N.D.C.C. § 28-26-31 and awarded the defendants their attorney fees and costs.
[¶2] On appeal, Tollefson argues he was not given proper notice of a number of events and/or proceedings in the district court, including the summary judgment motion and hearing. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), concluding that the record reflects that Tollefson was provided with notice of the events and/or proceedings in the district court.
State v. White
,
[¶3] Finally, we conclude Tollefson's appeal is frivolous and without merit, and therefore we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).
See
Witzke v. City of Bismarck
,
[¶4] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
James Gion, D.J.
Daniel El-Dweek, D.J.
[¶5] The Honorable Daniel El-Dweek, D.J., and the Honorable James Gion, D.J., sitting in place of Crothers, J., and McEvers, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 ND 32, 922 N.W.2d 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tollefson-v-anderson-fercho-pllp-nd-2019.