Toll v. Toll

882 S.W.2d 290
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 12, 1994·No. Nos. WD 47759, WD 47760, WD 48506 and WD 48507·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alfred Toll appeals from an order of protection granted to his wife, Lupe Toll, section 455.010, et seq., RSMo Supp.1992, and from an order of protection granted to his daughter and two step-daughters, section 455.500, et seq., RSMo Supp.1992.

During the pendency of this appeal, the protection orders expired and were no longer in effect when the case was submitted. The case is therefore moot. See K.E.B. et al. v. H.G.B., 782 S.W.2d 85, 86 (Mo.App.1989).

We in our discretion decide moot appeals “where an issue of public importance prom[291]*291ises to recur, yet will evade decision, unless the court accedes to adjudicate, (citations omitted). The question becomes whether the appeal puts at stake some legal principle on a public question not previously ruled.” Grogan v. Hays, 639 S.W.2d 875, 879 (Mo.App.1982).

This appeal presents no issue of public importance which has not been decided. The issue is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s orders. The vindication of Alfred Toll is not of sufficient gravity, from a public standpoint, to cause us to waive the mootness of the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toll v. Toll, 882 S.W.2d 290 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

882 S.W.2d 290 (Toll v. Toll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re JLR
257 S.W.3d 163 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)
In the Interest of J.L.R.
257 S.W.3d 163 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)
McGrath v. McGrath
939 S.W.2d 46 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997)
Pope v. Howard
907 S.W.2d 257 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995)
Glenn v. Moyer
902 S.W.2d 355 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995)