Toll Brothers Builders, Hockessin Chase LP, Michael Brown, Timothy J. Hoban, Michael Klein v. Frederick Williams

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedAugust 7, 2024
DocketN24M-06-136 JRJ
StatusPublished

This text of Toll Brothers Builders, Hockessin Chase LP, Michael Brown, Timothy J. Hoban, Michael Klein v. Frederick Williams (Toll Brothers Builders, Hockessin Chase LP, Michael Brown, Timothy J. Hoban, Michael Klein v. Frederick Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toll Brothers Builders, Hockessin Chase LP, Michael Brown, Timothy J. Hoban, Michael Klein v. Frederick Williams, (Del. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Toll Brothers builders, Hockessin ) LP, Michael Brown, Timothy J. ) Hoban, Michael Klein, ) ) Petitioners, ) v. ) C.A. No. N24M-06-136 ) Frederick Williams, ) ) Respondent. )

Date Submitted: August 1, 2024 Date Decided: August 7, 2024

ORDER

AND NOW TO WIT, this 7th day of August, 2024, the Court having

considered Respondent’s Motion for Recusal,1 the relevant case law, and the record,

IT APPEARS THAT:

1. Respondent argues this judge should recuse herself because she dismissed his

case,2 “showed no regards for the facts of the case,” and discriminated against

him because of his race.3

2. When faced with a claim of personal prejudice of the judge, the judge is

required to engage in a two-part analysis:

First, [s]he must, as a matter of subjective belief, be

1 Mot. for Recusal of the Honorable Jan R. Jurden, Trans. ID 73965517 (Aug. 6, 2024) (“Motion”). 2 Respondent is referring to Case No. N22C-12-122-JRJ. See July 13, 2023 Order, Trans. ID 70377281 (Jul. 13, 2023). 3 Motion. satisfied that [s]he can proceed to hear the cause free of bias or prejudice concerning that party. Second, even if the judge believes that [s]he has no bias, situations may arise where, actual bias aside, there is an appearance of bias sufficient to cause doubt as to the judge’s impartiality.4

3. With regard to the subjective test, this judge is satisfied she can proceed to

hear the pending motion for sanctions against Respondent free of any bias or

prejudice against him. This judge bears no ill will and harbors no animosity

toward Respondent.

4. With regard to the objective test, the Delaware Supreme Court has ruled that

a judge is not required to recuse herself because of adverse rulings in the same

or prior proceedings.5

WHEREFORE, the Respondent’s Motion for Recusal is DENIED.

/s/ Jan R. Jurden Jan R. Jurden, President Judge

Original to Prothonotary:

cc: Anthony N. Delcollo, Esq. Frederick Williams

4 Los v. Los, 595 A.2d, 381, 384-85 (Del. Supr. 1991). 5 Id. at 385. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Los v. Los
595 A.2d 381 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Toll Brothers Builders, Hockessin Chase LP, Michael Brown, Timothy J. Hoban, Michael Klein v. Frederick Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toll-brothers-builders-hockessin-chase-lp-michael-brown-timothy-j-delsuperct-2024.