Toliver v. State

896 So. 2d 971, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4476, 2005 WL 735899
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Toliver v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5186
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 2005·No. No. 5D03-3309·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Compare Alvelo v. State, 866 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (allowing a police officer to testify that the defendant was processing and dealing in heroin from his home was harmless in light of defendant’s admissions to a police officer, his knowledge that the “material” was hidden under the insoles of his visitor’s shoes, and the evidence of drug dealing in the home).

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toliver v. State, 896 So. 2d 971, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4476, 2005 WL 735899 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

896 So. 2d 971 (Toliver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alvelo v. State
866 So. 2d 1240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)