Toliver v. Hubbell

6 Tex. 166
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1851·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Lipscomb, J.

The assignment .presents the single question, Can the judgment of the Probate Court be set aside and held to be invalid on a collateral inquiry into its sufficiency? The negative of this proposition was laid down by this Court in Sutherland v. De Leon, (1 Tex. R.,) and in Lynch and another v. Baxter and wife, (4 Tex. R., 431,) and Neill v. Hodge, (5 Tex. R., 487,) so that the doctrine is now finally settled that such judgment is binding until it has been reversed or set aside by a proceeding having that object directly in view. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toliver v. Hubbell, 6 Tex. 166 (Tex. 1851).

6 Tex. 166 (Toliver v. Hubbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Wynne
129 S.W.2d 279 (Texas Supreme Court, 1939)
Jones v. Wynne
104 S.W.2d 141 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Scott v. Scott
170 S.W. 273 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Eccles v. Daniels
16 Tex. 136 (Texas Supreme Court, 1856)
Dancy v. Stricklinge
15 Tex. 557 (Texas Supreme Court, 1855)