Tolin v. State
824 So. 2d 260, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395, 2002 WL 1828126
Opinion
The Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Major v. State, 814 So.2d 424, 431 (Fla. 2002), bars the appellant’s claim that his counsel failed to advise him of the potential recidivist consequences of his plea. This is not to be confused with our determination that a claim of affirmative mis-advice on the same issue is similarly precluded. See Bates v. State, 818 So.2d 626, (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tolin v. State, 824 So. 2d 260, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395, 2002 WL 1828126 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
824 So. 2d 260 (Tolin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bates v. State
818 So. 2d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Major v. State
814 So. 2d 424 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)