Toles v. Young

Fourth Circuit

Toles v. Young

55 F. App'x 152

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 2003·No. Nos. 02-6599, 02-6600·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In No. 02-6600, Darnell A. Toles appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action attacking enforcement of the prison’s grooming policy. In No. 02-6599, the prison officials cross-appealed, arguing the district court should have dismissed Toles’ complaint on other grounds. In No. 02-6600, we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons stated by the district court. See Toles v. Young, No. CA-00-210 (W.D.Va. Mar. 6, 2002). We dismiss the cross-appeal, No. 02-6599, for lack of standing. See Deposit Guar. Nat’l Bank v. Roper, 445 U.S. 326, 333-34, 100 S.Ct. 1166, 63 L.Ed.2d 427 (1980); HCA Health Servs. of Va. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 957 F.2d 120, 123 (4th Cir.1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 02-6599 — DISMISSED

No. 02-6600 — AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In No. 02-6600, Darnell A. Toles appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action attacking enforcement of the prison’s grooming policy. In No. 02-6599, the prison officials cross-appealed, arguing the district court should have dismissed Toles’ complaint on other grounds. In No. 02-6600, we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons stated by the district court. See Toles v. Young, No. CA-00-210 (W.D.Va. Mar. 6, 2002). We dismiss the cross-appeal, No. 02-6599, for lack of standing. See Deposit Guar. Nat’l Bank v. Roper, 445 U.S. 326, 333-34, 100 S.Ct. 1166, 63 L.Ed.2d 427 (1980); HCA Health Servs. of Va. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 957 F.2d 120, 123 (4th Cir.1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 02-6599 — DISMISSED

No. 02-6600 — AFFIRMED

Toles v. Young, 55 F. App'x 152 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 152 (Toles v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Hca Health Services of Virginia, T/a Henrico Doctors' Hospital Richmond Community Hospital, a Virginia Non-Stock Corporation Richmond Eye and Ear Hospital, a Virginia Non-Stock Corporation v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Corporation Metlife Healthcare Management Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Hca Health Services of Virginia, T/a Henrico Doctors' Hospital Richmond Community Hospital, a Virginia Non-Stock Corporation Richmond Eye and Ear Hospital, a Virginia Non-Stock Corporation v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Corporation Metlife Healthcare Management Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

957 F.2d 120 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)

Opinion

Related