Toler v. Department of Highways

West Virginia Court of Claims

Toler v. Department of Highways

15 Ct. Cl. 116

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedFebruary 14, 1984

DocketCC-83-182

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ct. Cl. 116 (Toler v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toler v. Department of Highways, 15 Ct. Cl. 116 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claimant is the owner of a 1972 Ford Mustang which was damaged when he struck a pothole on Route 85 near Greenwood, Boone County, West Virginia. The incident occurred at approximately 3:30 p.m. on May 18, 1983. Claimant testified that the vehicle hit a hole which extended across the road. This caused a tire to burst, sending the car to the other side of the road where it struck a second pothole and then a telephone pole. Claimant valued the vehicle as a complete loss and seeks $2,000.00 in damages.

Claimant testified that Route 85 was deteriorated in the area of the accident. He said that he knew of other persons who had suffered vehicle damage on that road, but he was not certain whether any of them reported those incidents to respondent. Claimant stated that he rode Route 85 daily and was aware of the condition of the road.

The State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of motorists travelling on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order for the respondent to be found liable, proof of actual or constructive notice of the defect in the road is required. Davis Auto Parts v. Dept. of Highways, 12 Ct.Cl. 31 (1977). While there may have been notice to respondent, the Court is of the opinion that the claimant, with his prior knowledge of the road’s condition, was also negligent. Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, the Court finds that the claimant’s negligence was equal to [117]*117or greater than any negligence on the part of the respondent, and disallows the claim.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Claimant is the owner of a 1972 Ford Mustang which was damaged when he struck a pothole on Route 85 near Greenwood, Boone County, West Virginia. The incident occurred at approximately 3:30 p.m. on May 18, 1983. Claimant testified that the vehicle hit a hole which extended across the road. This caused a tire to burst, sending the car to the other side of the road where it struck a second pothole and then a telephone pole. Claimant valued the vehicle as a complete loss and seeks $2,000.00 in damages.

Claimant testified that Route 85 was deteriorated in the area of the accident. He said that he knew of other persons who had suffered vehicle damage on that road, but he was not certain whether any of them reported those incidents to respondent. Claimant stated that he rode Route 85 daily and was aware of the condition of the road.

The State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of motorists travelling on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order for the respondent to be found liable, proof of actual or constructive notice of the defect in the road is required. Davis Auto Parts v. Dept. of Highways, 12 Ct.Cl. 31 (1977). While there may have been notice to respondent, the Court is of the opinion that the claimant, with his prior knowledge of the road’s condition, was also negligent. Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, the Court finds that the claimant’s negligence was equal to [117]*117or greater than any negligence on the part of the respondent, and disallows the claim.

Claim disallowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ct. Cl. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toler-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack