Toler, Jordan Donald
This text of Toler, Jordan Donald (Toler, Jordan Donald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,738-01
EX PARTE JORDAN DONALD TOLER, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 24629 HC-1 IN THE SIXTH DISTRICT COURT FROM LAMAR COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant originally pleaded guilty to attempt
to commit theft of property valued at more than $100,000 but less than $200,000, in exchange for
deferred adjudication community supervision. He was later adjudicated guilty and sentenced to three
years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
Applicant contends, among other things,1 that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance
1 This Court has considered Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit. 2
because counsel failed to investigate or advise Applicant of the availability of an insanity defense,
and failed to investigate the value of the property that Applicant was charged with attempting to
steal.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The
trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the
performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and
conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for
habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall 3
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 16, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Toler, Jordan Donald, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toler-jordan-donald-texcrimapp-2015.