Tolen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tolen v. State

546 S.W.3d 610

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 20, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105956

StatusPublished

This text of 546 S.W.3d 610 (Tolen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tolen v. State, 546 S.W.3d 610 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric T. Tolen ("Movant") appeals the judgment of the motion court, in which it denied his Motion to Reopen his Rule 29.15 Post-Conviction Proceedings pursuant to Rule 75.01. Finding Movant cannot establish that his plea counsel failed to comply with Rule 29.15(e), we affirm the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eric T. Tolen ("Movant") appeals the judgment of the motion court, in which it denied his Motion to Reopen his Rule 29.15 Post-Conviction Proceedings pursuant to Rule 75.01. Finding Movant cannot establish that his plea counsel failed to comply with Rule 29.15(e), we affirm the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

546 S.W.3d 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tolen-v-state-moctapp-2018.