Tolen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tolen v. State

353 S.W.3d 52, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1199, 2011 WL 4036396

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 13, 2011

DocketED 95439

StatusPublished

This text of 353 S.W.3d 52 (Tolen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tolen v. State, 353 S.W.3d 52, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1199, 2011 WL 4036396 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Tolen appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Daugherty v. State, 159 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided *53 a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Tolen appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Daugherty v. State, 159 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided *53 a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 S.W.3d 52, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1199, 2011 WL 4036396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tolen-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack