Tolen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tolen v. State

353 S.W.3d 52, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1199, 2011 WL 4036396

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 2011·No. ED 95439·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Tolen appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Daugherty v. State, 159 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided *53 a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Tolen appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Daugherty v. State, 159 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided *53 a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Tolen v. State, 353 S.W.3d 52, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1199, 2011 WL 4036396 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

353 S.W.3d 52 (Tolen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related