Toledo v. Toledo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Toledo v. Toledo

762 So. 2d 570, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8241, 2000 WL 873303

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 5, 2000

DocketNo. 3D00-163

StatusPublished

This text of 762 So. 2d 570 (Toledo v. Toledo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toledo v. Toledo, 762 So. 2d 570, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8241, 2000 WL 873303 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Toledo (“former husband”) appeals the trial court’s final judgment of dissolution of marriage. ■ Of the numerous issues raised, we find merit only with regard to the former husband’s claim of error in the calculation of the final distribution amount. Either through a mathematical or clerical error in calculations, [571]*571the trial court failed to disburse $10,000 from the equity in the marital home.

Accordingly, we reverse the amount awarded as equitable distribution for the marital home, with instructions to recalculate each party’s one-half share based upon a remaining equity figure in the home of $32,799.00. See Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). In all other respects, the final judgment below is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Toledo (“former husband”) appeals the trial court’s final judgment of dissolution of marriage. ■ Of the numerous issues raised, we find merit only with regard to the former husband’s claim of error in the calculation of the final distribution amount. Either through a mathematical or clerical error in calculations, [571]*571the trial court failed to disburse $10,000 from the equity in the marital home.

Accordingly, we reverse the amount awarded as equitable distribution for the marital home, with instructions to recalculate each party’s one-half share based upon a remaining equity figure in the home of $32,799.00. See Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). In all other respects, the final judgment below is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

762 So. 2d 570, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8241, 2000 WL 873303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-v-toledo-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack