Toledo v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Toledo v. Pub. Util. Comm.

679 N.E.2d 307, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1510, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3929

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 23, 1997

Docket96-1886

StatusPublished

This text of 679 N.E.2d 307 (Toledo v. Pub. Util. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toledo v. Pub. Util. Comm., 679 N.E.2d 307, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1510, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3929 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 95-1140-EL-COI and 95-299-EL-AIR. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of the joint motion for a stay of proceedings by city of Toledo and intervening appellees, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Toledo Edison Company,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for a stay of proceedings be, and hereby is, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 95-1140-EL-COI and 95-299-EL-AIR. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of the joint motion for a stay of proceedings by city of Toledo and intervening appellees, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Toledo Edison Company,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for a stay of proceedings be, and hereby is, granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

679 N.E.2d 307, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1510, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-v-pub-util-comm-ohio-1997.