Toledo v. Iglesia Ni Christo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Toledo v. Iglesia Ni Christo

71 A.D.3d 404, 894 N.Y.S.2d 869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 A.D.3d 404 (Toledo v. Iglesia Ni Christo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toledo v. Iglesia Ni Christo, 71 A.D.3d 404, 894 N.Y.S.2d 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered November 6, 2008, in an action for wrongful death, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarding interest on future damages calculated on the value of those damages discounted to the date of death and going forward from that date to the date of the verdict, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded for calculation of interest only on the non-lump-sum portion of the future damages award going forward from the date of the verdict.

[405]*405Interest on the award of future damages, which already had been discounted by the court to the date of the verdict, should have been calculated only on the non-lump-sum portion of the future damages award from the date of the verdict (Pay v State of New York, 87 NY2d 1011 [1996]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, McGuire, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered November 6, 2008, in an action for wrongful death, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarding interest on future damages calculated on the value of those damages discounted to the date of death and going forward from that date to the date of the verdict, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded for calculation of interest only on the non-lump-sum portion of the future damages award going forward from the date of the verdict.

[405]*405Interest on the award of future damages, which already had been discounted by the court to the date of the verdict, should have been calculated only on the non-lump-sum portion of the future damages award from the date of the verdict (Pay v State of New York, 87 NY2d 1011 [1996]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, McGuire, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.3d 404, 894 N.Y.S.2d 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-v-iglesia-ni-christo-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack