Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. Vreeland

Ohio Supreme Court

Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. Vreeland

84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 485

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 31, 1911

DocketNo. 12413

StatusPublished

This text of 84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 485 (Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. Vreeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. Vreeland, 84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 485 (Ohio 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit, court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed, without passing upon the question of whether or not the court erred in' its charge to the jury in paragraphs numbered 1, 2 and 3, to be found on pages 88 and 89 of the printed record, the court being of opinion that, considering the character and effect of the undisputed evidence in the case, the charge thus given to the jury cannot have been prejudicial.

Spear, C. J., Davis, Shauck, Joi-inson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit, court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed, without passing upon the question of whether or not the court erred in' its charge to the jury in paragraphs numbered 1, 2 and 3, to be found on pages 88 and 89 of the printed record, the court being of opinion that, considering the character and effect of the undisputed evidence in the case, the charge thus given to the jury cannot have been prejudicial.

Spear, C. J., Davis, Shauck, Joi-inson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-railways-light-co-v-vreeland-ohio-1911.