Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Wickery
This text of 44 Ill. 76 (Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Wickery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have examined the testimony in this case, and it is conclusive on the point, that the road had been in operation several years, and was not fenced as the statute requires, and that the place where the accident occurred was a point outside of the town, where the law requires a fence.
We perceive no ground for disturbing the verdict, and must affirm the judgment.
J-udgmmi affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Ill. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-peoria-warsaw-railway-co-v-wickery-ill-1867.