Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Wickery
44 Ill. 76
Opinion
We have examined the testimony in this case, and it is conclusive on the point, that the road had been in operation several years, and was not fenced as the statute requires, and that the place where the accident occurred was a point outside of the town, where the law requires a fence.
We perceive no ground for disturbing the verdict, and must affirm the judgment.
J-udgmmi affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Wickery, 44 Ill. 76 (Ill. 1867).
44 Ill. 76 (Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Wickery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Steele
1913 OK 412 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)