Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Webster
This text of 55 Ill. 338 (Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the authority of the case of C. & R. I. R. R. Co. v. Morris, 26 Ill. 402, the objection of a want of venue can not be taken advantage of after verdict. The proof insisted on by appellants was not material. The evidence sustains the verdict, and the judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
The cases of Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Company v. John C. Fry, Same v. David D. Tullis and Same v. David Eastburn, rest on the same point as the preceding case, and the same judgment of affirmance is rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 Ill. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-peoria-warsaw-railway-co-v-webster-ill-1870.