Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. v. Village of Hartford

Ohio Supreme Court

Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. v. Village of Hartford

101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 520

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 18, 1920

DocketNo. 16366

StatusPublished

This text of 101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 520 (Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. v. Village of Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. v. Village of Hartford, 101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 520 (Ohio 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

The court finds that the court of appeals erred in the admission of the transcript of testimony taken in a former hearing of the cause under the circumstances and within the limitations laid down by the court as shown by the record. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the court of appeals b‘e, and the same is hereby, reversed, and it is further ordered and adjudged that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the court of appeals with instructions to proceed with the trial of the cause de novo, the parties being permitted to introduce in evidence relevant testimony under the legal rules applicable in the trial of questions of fact in trial courts.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker and Merrell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court finds that the court of appeals erred in the admission of the transcript of testimony taken in a former hearing of the cause under the circumstances and within the limitations laid down by the court as shown by the record. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the court of appeals b‘e, and the same is hereby, reversed, and it is further ordered and adjudged that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the court of appeals with instructions to proceed with the trial of the cause de novo, the parties being permitted to introduce in evidence relevant testimony under the legal rules applicable in the trial of questions of fact in trial courts.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker and Merrell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-ohio-central-railway-co-v-village-of-hartford-ohio-1920.