Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. v. Sherman

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 617
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 23, 1913
DocketNo. 14051
StatusPublished

This text of 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 617 (Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. v. Sherman, 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 617 (Ohio 1913).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed on ground stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

The court finds that the findings of error made by the court of appeals and included in its entry of February 13, 1913, were correct; and this court further finds that the court of common pleas erred in ruling out evidence offered by the plaintiff to show the existence of rule 915 and the decedent’s knowledge of such rule;

It is further ordered that this cause be remanded to the court of common pleas of Lucas county for further proceedings according to law.

Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-ohio-central-railway-co-v-sherman-ohio-1913.