Toledo Edison Co. v. City of Bryan

742 N.E.2d 655, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1233
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 7, 2001·No. No. 99-1280·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

The motion for reconsideration is denied.

F.E. Sweeney, Acting C.J., Gwin, Hadley, O’Neill, Pfeifer, Young and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., concurs separately. Fuller & Henry, Ltd., Craig J. Van Horsten and Mary Ann Whipple, for appellant. Chester, Willeox & Saxbe, L.L.P., and John W. Bentine; Duncan & Allen and John P. Coyle, for appellees. W. Scott Gwin, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Moyer, C.J. Ronald E. Hadley, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting for Douglas, J. William M. O’Neill, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J. William W. Young, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toledo Edison Co. v. City of Bryan, 742 N.E.2d 655, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1233 (Ohio 2001).

742 N.E.2d 655 (Toledo Edison Co. v. City of Bryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Gross v. Industrial Commission
874 N.E.2d 1162 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Toledo Edison Co. v. Bryan
2001 Ohio 272 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)