Toledo Edison Co. v. City of Bryan

742 N.E.2d 655, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1233
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 7, 2001
DocketNo. 99-1280
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 742 N.E.2d 655 (Toledo Edison Co. v. City of Bryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toledo Edison Co. v. City of Bryan, 742 N.E.2d 655, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1233 (Ohio 2001).

Opinions

The motion for reconsideration is denied.

F.E. Sweeney, Acting C.J., Gwin, Hadley, O’Neill, Pfeifer, Young and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., concurs separately. Fuller & Henry, Ltd., Craig J. Van Horsten and Mary Ann Whipple, for appellant. Chester, Willeox & Saxbe, L.L.P., and John W. Bentine; Duncan & Allen and John P. Coyle, for appellees. W. Scott Gwin, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Moyer, C.J. Ronald E. Hadley, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting for Douglas, J. William M. O’Neill, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J. William W. Young, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Gross v. Industrial Commission
874 N.E.2d 1162 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Toledo Edison Co. v. Bryan
2001 Ohio 272 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
742 N.E.2d 655, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-edison-co-v-city-of-bryan-ohio-2001.