Toledo Blade Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Sixth Circuit

Toledo Blade Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

180 F.2d 357

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 9, 1950·No. 10963_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record in the above cause and the oral argument of counsel, and

It being our view that the purchase by the petitioner of certain assets of the competing newspaper, the value of which to the purchaser was protected by covenant of the seller that it would not resume publication of a newspaper for ten years constituted a capital investment, now, therefore,

It is ordered that the decision of the Tax Court, 11 T.C. 1079, be and it is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law announced by the Tax Court in docket No. 12827, promulgated December 23, 1948.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record in the above cause and the oral argument of counsel, and

It being our view that the purchase by the petitioner of certain assets of the competing newspaper, the value of which to the purchaser was protected by covenant of the seller that it would not resume publication of a newspaper for ten years constituted a capital investment, now, therefore,

It is ordered that the decision of the Tax Court, 11 T.C. 1079, be and it is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law announced by the Tax Court in docket No. 12827, promulgated December 23, 1948.

Toledo Blade Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 180 F.2d 357 (6th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

180 F.2d 357 (Toledo Blade Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related