Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wallace

47 Ohio St. 3d 131
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wallace. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 Ohio St. 3d 3
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 25, 1989·No. No. D.D. 88-21·Published

Opinion

The application for reinstatement to the practice of law is granted. Braden R. Wallace is reinstated to'the practice of law in the state of Ohio conditioned on the following: If Wallace is found liable on any claim(s) filed against him with the Clients’ Security Fund of Ohio, he must pay in full all amounts for which he is found liable within sixty days of the order of the Clients’ Security Fund; if Wallace fails to pay such amounts in full within sixty days, his license to practice law will be suspended forthwith.

(For earlier case, see [1989], 42 Ohio St. 3d 3, 535 N.E. 2d 655.)

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wallace, 47 Ohio St. 3d 131 (Ohio 1989).

47 Ohio St. 3d 131 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wallace
535 N.E.2d 655 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)