Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Sanders

630 N.E.2d 366, 69 Ohio St. 3d 71
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Sanders. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Ohio St. 3d 1505
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 20, 1994·No. No. 91-1763·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but that suspension is stayed for a period of one year upon the conditions recommended by the board, and upon the further condition that the psychological treatment and the monitoring are for the duration of the stayed suspension. However, upon further review, we find that respondent is not in compliance with the registration requirements of this court. Accordingly, respondent is suspended indefinitely until he fully complies with the registration requirements of this court. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Sanders, 630 N.E.2d 366, 69 Ohio St. 3d 71 (Ohio 1994).

630 N.E.2d 366 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.