Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Potts

459 N.E.2d 499, 9 Ohio St. 3d 89, 9 Ohio B. 318, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1012
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 1984·No. D.D. No. 83-31·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 9-102.

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. C. Brown, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Potts, 459 N.E.2d 499, 9 Ohio St. 3d 89, 9 Ohio B. 318, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1012 (Ohio 1984).

459 N.E.2d 499 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Potts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Gill
528 N.E.2d 945 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Walker
502 N.E.2d 646 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1986)