Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Merillat

429 N.E.2d 158, 68 Ohio St. 2d 146, 22 Ohio Op. 3d 382, 1981 Ohio LEXIS 634
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 16, 1981·No. D.D. No. 81-22·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the record in this cause and the findings of fact of the board of commissioners, we conclude there is sufficient evidence to find respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), (5) and (6) and DR 6-101 (A)(2) and (3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

We concur with the board’s recommendation and hereby indefinitely suspend respondent, Paul Merillat, from the practice of law in Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Merillat, 429 N.E.2d 158, 68 Ohio St. 2d 146, 22 Ohio Op. 3d 382, 1981 Ohio LEXIS 634 (Ohio 1981).

429 N.E.2d 158 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Merillat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Merillat
532 N.E.2d 1314 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Chaney
465 N.E.2d 53 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1984)