Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lubitsky

590 N.E.2d 746, 63 Ohio St. 3d 669, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 922
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 20, 1992·No. No. 91-2165·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record, and concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent, Gerald S. Lubitsky, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, with reinstatement contingent upon his return of $8,500 to Samuel Geraldo. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, McCormac, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. John W. McCormac, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Douglas, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lubitsky, 590 N.E.2d 746, 63 Ohio St. 3d 669, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 922 (Ohio 1992).

590 N.E.2d 746 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lubitsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Davis
2012 Ohio 4998 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Burns v. Daily
683 N.E.2d 1164 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1996)