Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lubitsky

Ohio Supreme Court

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lubitsky

590 N.E.2d 746, 63 Ohio St. 3d 669, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 922

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 20, 1992

DocketNo. 91-2165

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 590 N.E.2d 746 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lubitsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lubitsky, 590 N.E.2d 746, 63 Ohio St. 3d 669, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 922 (Ohio 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record, and concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent, Gerald S. Lubitsky, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, with reinstatement contingent upon his return of $8,500 to Samuel Geraldo. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, McCormac, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. John W. McCormac, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Douglas, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record, and concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent, Gerald S. Lubitsky, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, with reinstatement contingent upon his return of $8,500 to Samuel Geraldo. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, McCormac, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. John W. McCormac, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Douglas, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

590 N.E.2d 746, 63 Ohio St. 3d 669, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-bar-assn-v-lubitsky-ohio-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack