Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Cook

791 N.E.2d 979, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1462
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 2003
Docket2002-0720
StatusPublished

This text of 791 N.E.2d 979 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Cook, 791 N.E.2d 979, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1462 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Robert H. Golden and Armand D. Kunz to appear on behalf of respondent, filed by James F. Hadley,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
791 N.E.2d 979, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-bar-assn-v-cook-ohio-2003.