Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Colburn

100 Ohio St. 3d 1202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Colburn. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 Ohio St. 3d 57
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 18, 2003·No. No. 2003-0394·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Anthony John Colburn, Attorney Registration No. 0065164, last known business address in Monclova, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of May 16, 2003, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with credit for time served under his interim suspension, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

[1203]*1203{¶ 5} For earlier cases, see Toledo Bar Assn. v. Colburn, 99 Ohio St.3d 57, 2003-Ohio-2472, 788 N.E.2d 1069; and In re Colburn (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 1474, 763 N.E.2d 183.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Colburn, 100 Ohio St. 3d 1202 (Ohio 2003).

100 Ohio St. 3d 1202 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Colburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Colburn
763 N.E.2d 183 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Colburn
99 Ohio St. 3d 57 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)