Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bridgeforth
This text of 623 N.E.2d 560 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bridgeforth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Application for Reinstatement.
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Henry C. Bridgeforth, Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0038388, last known address in Memphis, Tennessee.
The court coming now to consider its order of August 8, 1990, suspending respondent, Henry C. Bridgeforth, Jr., from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year effective April 11, 1990, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V, former Sections 7 and 23 (now Sections 6 and 9, respectively), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that Henry C. Bridgeforth, Jr. be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).
For earlier case, see Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bridgeforth (1990), 51 Ohio St.3d 601, 553 N.E.2d 1025, and 53 Ohio St.3d 93, 558 N.E.2d 1182.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
623 N.E.2d 560, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1202, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 2693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-bar-assn-v-bridgeforth-ohio-1993.