Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bridgeforth

531 N.E.2d 317, 40 Ohio St. 3d 2, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 392
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 30, 1988·No. No. D.D. 88-16·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court agrees with the board’s findings and we adopt its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. However, this penalty is suspended while respondent completes a one-year probationary period during which he shall submit to relator’s monitoring and observe the standards set forth in the board’s recommendation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bridgeforth, 531 N.E.2d 317, 40 Ohio St. 3d 2, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 392 (Ohio 1988).

531 N.E.2d 317 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bridgeforth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walton v. Lewis
46 Fla. Supp. 2d 138 (Palm Beach County Court, 1991)
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bridgeforth
558 N.E.2d 1182 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1990)