Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bridgeforth

Ohio Supreme Court

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bridgeforth

531 N.E.2d 317, 40 Ohio St. 3d 2, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 392

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 30, 1988

DocketNo. D.D. 88-16

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 531 N.E.2d 317 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bridgeforth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bridgeforth, 531 N.E.2d 317, 40 Ohio St. 3d 2, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 392 (Ohio 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court agrees with the board’s findings and we adopt its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. However, this penalty is suspended while respondent completes a one-year probationary period during which he shall submit to relator’s monitoring and observe the standards set forth in the board’s recommendation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This court agrees with the board’s findings and we adopt its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. However, this penalty is suspended while respondent completes a one-year probationary period during which he shall submit to relator’s monitoring and observe the standards set forth in the board’s recommendation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

531 N.E.2d 317, 40 Ohio St. 3d 2, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-bar-assn-v-bridgeforth-ohio-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack