Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop

Ohio Supreme Court

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop

2021 Ohio 365, 168 N.E.3d 549, 163 Ohio St. 3d 1226

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 2021

Docket2019-0804

StatusPublished

This text of 2021 Ohio 365 (Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop, 2021 Ohio 365, 168 N.E.3d 549, 163 Ohio St. 3d 1226 (Ohio 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-365.]

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. BISHOP. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-365.] (No. 2019-0804-—Submitted February 9—Decided February 10, 2021.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an amended application for reinstatement by respondent, Jerry James Bishop II, Attorney Registration No. 0016287, last known business address in Toledo, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 24, 2019, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with the second year stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop, 158 Ohio St.3d 366, 2019-Ohio-5288, 143 N.E.3d 485. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. ________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-365.]

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. BISHOP. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-365.] (No. 2019-0804-—Submitted February 9—Decided February 10, 2021.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an amended application for reinstatement by respondent, Jerry James Bishop II, Attorney Registration No. 0016287, last known business address in Toledo, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 24, 2019, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with the second year stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop, 158 Ohio St.3d 366, 2019-Ohio-5288, 143 N.E.3d 485. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. ________________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2021 Ohio 365, 168 N.E.3d 549, 163 Ohio St. 3d 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-bar-assn-v-bishop-ohio-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack