Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bell

Ohio Supreme Court

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bell

690 N.E.2d 18, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1448, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 418

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 18, 1998

Docket96-2432

StatusPublished

This text of 690 N.E.2d 18 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bell, 690 N.E.2d 18, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1448, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 418 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by relator, Toledo Bar Association, on October 31, 1997, of a motion for an order to show cause requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent, Angelia D. Bell, a.k.a. Angelia Diane Bell, to show cause why she should not be held in violation of the court’s order of March 26, 1997. On December 17,1997, the court granted the motion to the extent that respondent was ordered to show cause by filing a written response why she should not be found in contempt. Respondent did not file a response to the court’s order. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that respondent, Angelia D. Bell, a.k.a. Angelia Diane Bell, Attorney Registration No. 0016851, last known business address in Toledo, Ohio, is hereby held to be in violation of this court’s March 26,1997 order.

Douglas, J., would find respondent in contempt. Resnick, J., would dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by relator, Toledo Bar Association, on October 31, 1997, of a motion for an order to show cause requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent, Angelia D. Bell, a.k.a. Angelia Diane Bell, to show cause why she should not be held in violation of the court’s order of March 26, 1997. On December 17,1997, the court granted the motion to the extent that respondent was ordered to show cause by filing a written response why she should not be found in contempt. Respondent did not file a response to the court’s order. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that respondent, Angelia D. Bell, a.k.a. Angelia Diane Bell, Attorney Registration No. 0016851, last known business address in Toledo, Ohio, is hereby held to be in violation of this court’s March 26,1997 order.

Douglas, J., would find respondent in contempt. Resnick, J., would dismiss.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

690 N.E.2d 18, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1448, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-bar-assn-v-bell-ohio-1998.