Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Auwaerter

430 N.E.2d 947, 69 Ohio St. 2d 85
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 1982
DocketD.D. No. 81-27
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 430 N.E.2d 947 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Auwaerter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Auwaerter, 430 N.E.2d 947, 69 Ohio St. 2d 85 (Ohio 1982).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

One

of the fundamental tenets of the professional responsibility of a lawyer is that he or she “should maintain a degree of personal and professional integrity that meets the highest standard. The integrity of the profession can be maintained only if the conduct of the individual attorney is above reproach. * * * ” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 77, 81.

After a careful examination and review of the entire record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and [87]*87conclusions of the board that respondent violated all the foregoing Disciplinary Rules.

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law, and it is so ordered.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hunter
2025 Ohio 2406 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 N.E.2d 947, 69 Ohio St. 2d 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-bar-assn-v-auwaerter-ohio-1982.