Tole v. State
Opinion
The appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the appellant’s first claim without further discussion. Because the appellant’s second claim is facially sufficient, and because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record which conclusively refute the appellant’s claim, we reverse and remand to the trial court to attach portions of the record which conclusively refute the appellant’s claim, to hold an evidentiary hearing, or to grant the relief requested. See State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Rackley v. State, 571 So.2d 533, 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
953 So. 2d 689 (Tole v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.