Tole v. State

953 So. 2d 689, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4894, 2007 WL 980732
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 2007·No. No. 1D06-3645·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the appellant’s first claim without further discussion. Because the appellant’s second claim is facially sufficient, and because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record which conclusively refute the appellant’s claim, we reverse and remand to the trial court to attach portions of the record which conclusively refute the appellant’s claim, to hold an evidentiary hearing, or to grant the relief requested. See State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Rackley v. State, 571 So.2d 533, 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BARFIELD, KAHN, and PADOVANO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tole v. State, 953 So. 2d 689, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4894, 2007 WL 980732 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

953 So. 2d 689 (Tole v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rackley v. State
571 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
State v. Leroux
689 So. 2d 235 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)