Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Tole Electric of Florida, Inc. v. Harris

Tole Electric of Florida, Inc. v. Harris

528 So. 2d 132, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1710, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3083, 1988 WL 73582
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2951
StatusPublished

This text of 528 So. 2d 132 (Tole Electric of Florida, Inc. v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tole Electric of Florida, Inc. v. Harris, 528 So. 2d 132, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1710, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3083, 1988 WL 73582 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Where there is no record activity within the year which moves the case toward a final disposition, or equivalent non-record activity coupled with an explanation which excuses the failure to meet pleading deadlines, the trial court must dismiss a cause pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) for failure to prosecute. Norflor Constr. Corp. v. City of Gainesville, 512 So.2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev. denied, 520 So.2d 585 (Fla.1988).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norflor Const. Corp. v. City of Gainesville
512 So. 2d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 So. 2d 132, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1710, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3083, 1988 WL 73582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tole-electric-of-florida-inc-v-harris-fladistctapp-1988.