Tolbert v. State

205 S.W. 987, 84 Tex. Crim. 159, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 321
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 23, 1918
DocketNo. 5130.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 205 S.W. 987 (Tolbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tolbert v. State, 205 S.W. 987, 84 Tex. Crim. 159, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 321 (Tex. 1918).

Opinion

MORROW, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft of property over the value of fifty dollars, and his punishment assessed at two years: confinement in the penitentiary.

The only question raised on the record relates to the sufficiency of the indictment, which is challenged on the ground that it is not sufficiently specific in describing the property which is alleged in the indictment to have been “one bale of seed cotton of the value of one hundred dollars.” We think the allegation is sufficient. See.Bell v. State, Ho. 51.29,' this day decided.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. State
632 S.W.2d 734 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Mays v. State
428 S.W.2d 325 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 S.W. 987, 84 Tex. Crim. 159, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tolbert-v-state-texcrimapp-1918.