Tolbert v. State

518 S.W.3d 288, 2017 WL 2118619, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 418
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 16, 2017·No. No. ED 103584·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eduardo Tolbert (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant raises one point on appeal, arguing the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.025 without an evidentiary hearing because defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call Movant and the victims as witnesses at the suppression hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tolbert v. State, 518 S.W.3d 288, 2017 WL 2118619, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 418 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

518 S.W.3d 288 (Tolbert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.