Tolbert Enterprises, Inc. v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Southeast Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tolbert Enterprises, Inc. v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Southeast Corp.

295 So. 2d 681, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7137

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 1974·No. No. 74-19·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by defendant from an order of the Circuit Court of Dade County denying defendant’s motion claiming privilege of venue. Defendant alleged in its motion that venue in Dade County was improper and that venue in Okaloosa County was proper under § 47.-011 of the Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

We have carefully considered the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See Spalding v. Von Zamft, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 208; Saf-T-Clean, Inc. v. Martin-Marietta Corporation, Fla.1967, 197 So.2d 8.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by defendant from an order of the Circuit Court of Dade County denying defendant’s motion claiming privilege of venue. Defendant alleged in its motion that venue in Dade County was improper and that venue in Okaloosa County was proper under § 47.-011 of the Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

We have carefully considered the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See Spalding v. Von Zamft, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 208; Saf-T-Clean, Inc. v. Martin-Marietta Corporation, Fla.1967, 197 So.2d 8.

Affirmed.

Tolbert Enterprises, Inc. v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Southeast Corp., 295 So. 2d 681, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7137 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

295 So. 2d 681 (Tolbert Enterprises, Inc. v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Southeast Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related