Tokes Adleye v. Magaret Modupe Driscal

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 6, 2015
Docket14-14-00822-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Tokes Adleye v. Magaret Modupe Driscal (Tokes Adleye v. Magaret Modupe Driscal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tokes Adleye v. Magaret Modupe Driscal, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 14-14-00822-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/6/2015 6:07:00 PM HOUSTON, TEXAS CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK

310THJUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2013-66224 APPEAL NO.: 14-14-00822-CV FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/6/2015 6:07:00 PM TOKES TOSIN ADLEYE, CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk Respondent!Appellant

v.

MARGARET MODUPE DRISCAL,

Petitioner!Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE 310TI-I JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE'S OPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE'S REPLY BRIEF

Respectfully submitted,

~4~6&~f04~~ THEODORE HA YNE~ Attomey for Petitioner!Appellee Texas Bar No. 00787665 P.O. Box 300833 Houston, Texas 77230-0833 Telephone: (713) 660-7646 Telecopier: (713) 660-0203 E-mail: thaynesjr@prodigy.net 1 TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

Pursuant to rules 38.6(d) and 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure, Petitioner!Appellee, MARGARET MODUPE DRlSCAL, (hereinafter

"Driscal"), files this Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee's Reply Brief.

Driscal respectfully shows:

1.

This is an appeal from an October 9, 2014, granting of a Final Decree of

Divorce, signed by the Honorable Judge, of the 3 10TH Judicial District Court, Harris

County, Texas, in Cause No. 2013-66224, in the case styled, In the Matter of the

Marriage ofMargaret Modupe Driscal and Tokes Tosin Adeleye.

II.

Driscal requests a ninety-day extension oftime for filing their Appellee's reply

brief, thus creating a new due date of AUGUST 7, 2015. This is Driscal's first

motion for extension of time to file the Appellants' brief. Because this case has not

yet been set for submission, no unnecessary delay will result with the granting of this

extension.

2 Ill.

Driscal relies on the following facts to reasonably explain her need for her first

1. Attorney of record for Petitioner!Appellee, THEODORE HAYNES, JR.,

received the Appellant's Brief of the Merits, on April 6, 2015, and did not have

adequate time to prepare a meritorious defense on behalf of Petitioner/Appellee. The

Appellant's Brief of the Merits is extremely lengthy and numbers one hundred and

three (103) pages. Attorney of Record for Petitioner/Appellee did not have adequate

time to use due diligence to locate, gather, organize and evaluate critical evidence.

2. The transcript was not received by the attorney of record for

Petitioner/Appellee, THEODORE HAYNES, JR., until APRIL 15,2015.

3. This motion IS for good cause and will not delay or prejudice the

Respondent!Appellant.

4. The parties disagree and this motion is opposed.

3 RELIEF

Petitioner/Appellee respectfully request that the Honorable Court of Appeals

grant a ninety-day extension for the filing of the Appellee's reply brief, thus creating

a new due date of AUGUST 7, 2015. Driscal further request all other appropriate

reliefto which she may be entitled.

Dated MAY 6, 2015.

~~q ~ THEODORE HAYNES, JR. Attorney for Petitioner!Appellee Texas Bar No. 00787665 P.O. Box 300833 Houston, Texas 77230-0833 Telephone: (713) 660-7646 Telecopier: (713) 660-0203 E-mail: thaynesjr@prodigy.net

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I THEODORE HAYNES, JR., Attorney of Record for Petitioner!Appellee, hereby certifY that I made a good faith effort to determine if the Appellee' s Opposed Motion for Extension of time to File Appellee's Reply Brief could be reconciled and settled in an uncontested proceeding with an agreed order. We have been unable to reach an agreement because Respondent/Appellant Pro Se, Tokes Tosin Adeleye, opposes the motion.

SIGNED this ~ T14- day of _ _ ~ _-n-_ _ _' 20 (5.

~ 1Vf(. ·~> Theodore Haynes, Jr. ~ Attorney for Petitioner!Appellee

4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certifY that a true and correct copy of the above Petitioner/Appellee's Opposed Motion for Extension of Time has been sent by facsimile and certified mail by depositing it enclosed in a postpaid, properly addressed wrapper in a post office or official depository under the care and custody of the United States Postal Service to Mr. Tokes Tosin Adeleye, 7091 Glen Cove Lane, Stone Mountain, Georgia 30087, Respondent!Appellant Pro Se.

SIGNED this G1 m- day of_~_--f...-_ _ _ _' 20 / C;

~~~~ Theodore Haynes, Jr. Attorney for Petitioner/Appellee

5 VERIFICATION

STATE OF TEXAS §

COUNTY OF HARRIS §

BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day personally appeared THEODORE HAYNES, JR., who being by me duly sworn on his oath deposed and said that he is the Attorney of Record for Petitioner!Appellee in the above-entitled and numbered cause; that he has read the above and foregoing; and that every statement contained therein is within his personal knowledge and true and correct.

;t£!/ J£, SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on the ,20 to certify which witness my hand and official seal. Gh-. day of

~::3~ ~gnature - /o~~C57V (Notary's typed or printed name)

My commission expires:_-+/,-t!_- _ "L--1-'-- - . . (...." I. CO "---_ _

(seal) . c

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tokes Adleye v. Magaret Modupe Driscal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tokes-adleye-v-magaret-modupe-driscal-texapp-2015.