Toise v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Toise v. Rowe

691 A.2d 1079, 240 Conn. 913, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 92

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 13, 1997·No. SC 15638·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 143 (AC 15090/15362), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[914] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15638. Maria Araujo Kahn, in support of the petition.. Nyle K Davey, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided March 13, 1997

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over these administrative appeals?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 143 (AC 15090/15362), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[914] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15638. Maria Araujo Kahn, in support of the petition.. Nyle K Davey, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided March 13, 1997

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over these administrative appeals?”

Toise v. Rowe, 691 A.2d 1079, 240 Conn. 913, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 92 (Colo. 1997).

Pincite

691 A.2d 1079 (Toise v. Rowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related