Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Toise v. Rowe

Toise v. Rowe

691 A.2d 1079, 240 Conn. 913, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 92
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 13, 1997
DocketSC 15638
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 691 A.2d 1079 (Toise v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toise v. Rowe, 691 A.2d 1079, 240 Conn. 913, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 92 (Colo. 1997).

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 143 (AC 15090/15362), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[914]*914The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15638. Maria Araujo Kahn, in support of the petition.. Nyle K Davey, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided March 13, 1997
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over these administrative appeals?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toise v. Rowe
707 A.2d 25 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 A.2d 1079, 240 Conn. 913, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toise-v-rowe-conn-1997.