Toher v. Brawley

5 N.Y.S. 958, 25 N.Y. St. Rep. 1041, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2778
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided June 27, 1889·Published

Opinion

Peb Oubiam.

Whether or not the pound-master was included in the words “ those responsible for cattle, ” there is no "doubt that Toher was responsible. The governor having issued a proclamation, it is presumed to continue in force until authoritatively revoked, no matter what individuals may think of the necessity for its continuance. It was the duty of Toher to get a permit before he moved the cattle. Had the pound-master delivered those cattle for the purpose of being moved, Toher not having obtained the necessary permit, the pound-master would have been responsible as a participant in a misdemeanor. Toher’s removal of the cattle without obtaining a permit would have been a misdemeanor. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toher v. Brawley, 5 N.Y.S. 958, 25 N.Y. St. Rep. 1041, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2778 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

5 N.Y.S. 958 (Toher v. Brawley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.