Toffel v. Baugher

133 So. 2d 420
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 4, 1961·No. No. 31065·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari because our preliminary examination of the record suggested a potential conflict with prior decisions of this Court in State ex rel. Weber v. Register, Fla.1953, 67 So.2d 619, and, Strasser v. Linn, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 458.

After oral argument and a thorough examination of the record and briefs we have the view that the District Court of Appeal has, by its opinion, accurately distinguished the instant case from the prior allegedly conflicting decisions of this Court. Toffel, Trustee v. Baugher et al., Fla.App., 125 So.2d 321.

We therefore conclude that the record under review is devoid of any jurisdictional conflict with prior decisions. Art. V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The writ is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toffel v. Baugher, 133 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1961).

133 So. 2d 420 (Toffel v. Baugher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael David Belcher v. State of Alabama
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2025
ABL Realty Corp. v. Cohl
384 So. 2d 1351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Hayes v. Greenwald
149 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)