Toffel v. Baugher
This text of 133 So. 2d 420 (Toffel v. Baugher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted certiorari because our preliminary examination of the record suggested a potential conflict with prior decisions of this Court in State ex rel. Weber v. Register, Fla.1953, 67 So.2d 619, and, Strasser v. Linn, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 458.
After oral argument and a thorough examination of the record and briefs we have the view that the District Court of Appeal has, by its opinion, accurately distinguished the instant case from the prior allegedly conflicting decisions of this Court. Toffel, Trustee v. Baugher et al., Fla.App., 125 So.2d 321.
We therefore conclude that the record under review is devoid of any jurisdictional conflict with prior decisions. Art. V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The writ is discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 So. 2d 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toffel-v-baugher-fla-1961.