Toes v. Coffee

12 Am. Tribal Law 183
CourtFort Peck Appellate Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 2015
DocketNo. 683
StatusPublished

This text of 12 Am. Tribal Law 183 (Toes v. Coffee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fort Peck Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toes v. Coffee, 12 Am. Tribal Law 183 (ftpeckctapp 2015).

Opinion

ORDER DENYING APPEAL

This matter comes before the Fort Peck Court of Appeals on a Notice of Appeal.

The Order appealed here is a Custody Order dated and filed November 20, 2014, Honorable Marvin Youpee, Jr., presiding.

The Order was entered by default since Appellant Rodney Turn Toes, adoptive father, failed to appear at the Initial and Fact Finding Hearings. Appellant Turn [184]*184Toes had been properly served with Notice of Hearings.

The jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals is extended to review determinations of the Tribal Court on matters of law, but it shall not set aside factual determinations supported by substantial evidence, II CCOJ, Chap. 2, Sec. 202.

The Order of Custody was properly entered by default when Appellant did not appear at hearings and offer evidence and testimony on his behalf. There is no record to review on Ms behalf and we cannot now hear any such evidence or evidence not of record.

We therefore ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

The Appeal is denied and the Judgment of the Tribal Court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Am. Tribal Law 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toes-v-coffee-ftpeckctapp-2015.