Toepel v. Wayne Circuit Judge

102 N.W. 369, 138 Mich. 302, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 849
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 30, 1904
DocketCalendar No. 20,837½
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 N.W. 369 (Toepel v. Wayne Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toepel v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 102 N.W. 369, 138 Mich. 302, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 849 (Mich. 1904).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for writ of mandamus or certiorari to review a motion to quash contempt proceedings. Denied for reason that these writs are not proper remedies at this stage of the proceedings. See following authorities: Palms v. Campau, 11 Mich. 109; Detroit, etc., R. Co. v. Backus, 48 Mich. 582; Grand Rapids, etc., R. Co. v. Weiden, 69 Mich. 572; People v. Thompson, 108 Mich. 583; 4 Enc. Pl. & Prac. 236. Also the following unreported memorandum cases: Detroit, etc., R. Co. v. Salliotte (19,972½), decided May 13, 1903, and In re Keenan (20,581½), decided June 16, 1904.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Smith
107 N.W. 724 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 N.W. 369, 138 Mich. 302, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toepel-v-wayne-circuit-judge-mich-1904.