Toepel v. Wayne Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Toepel v. Wayne Circuit Judge

102 N.W. 369, 138 Mich. 302, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 849

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 30, 1904·No. Calendar No. 20,837½·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for writ of mandamus or certiorari to review a motion to quash contempt proceedings. Denied for reason that these writs are not proper remedies at this stage of the proceedings. See following authorities: Palms v. Campau, 11 Mich. 109; Detroit, etc., R. Co. v. Backus, 48 Mich. 582; Grand Rapids, etc., R. Co. v. Weiden, 69 Mich. 572; People v. Thompson, 108 Mich. 583; 4 Enc. Pl. & Prac. 236. Also the following unreported memorandum cases: Detroit, etc., R. Co. v. Salliotte (19,972½), decided May 13, 1903, and In re Keenan (20,581½), decided June 16, 1904.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Application for writ of mandamus or certiorari to review a motion to quash contempt proceedings. Denied for reason that these writs are not proper remedies at this stage of the proceedings. See following authorities: Palms v. Campau, 11 Mich. 109; Detroit, etc., R. Co. v. Backus, 48 Mich. 582; Grand Rapids, etc., R. Co. v. Weiden, 69 Mich. 572; People v. Thompson, 108 Mich. 583; 4 Enc. Pl. & Prac. 236. Also the following unreported memorandum cases: Detroit, etc., R. Co. v. Salliotte (19,972½), decided May 13, 1903, and In re Keenan (20,581½), decided June 16, 1904.

Toepel v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 102 N.W. 369, 138 Mich. 302, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 849 (Mich. 1904).

Pincite

102 N.W. 369 (Toepel v. Wayne Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related