Todtman v. Ashraf

Second Circuit

Todtman v. Ashraf

316 F. App'x 51

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 20, 2009

DocketNo. 07-1347-cv

StatusPublished

This text of 316 F. App'x 51 (Todtman v. Ashraf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Todtman v. Ashraf, 316 F. App'x 51 (2d Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendants appeal the District Court’s entry of default judgment and denial of a motion to vacate the entry of default judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity as to the facts, procedural history, and issues raised on appeal.

We review the District Court’s decision for abuse of discretion. See Pecarsky v. Galaxiworld.com Ltd., 249 F.3d 167, 171 [52]*52(2d Cir.2001). Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we find Appellants’ claims to be meritless for substantially the reasons stated by the District Court. Accordingly, we AFFIRM its decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendants appeal the District Court’s entry of default judgment and denial of a motion to vacate the entry of default judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity as to the facts, procedural history, and issues raised on appeal.

We review the District Court’s decision for abuse of discretion. See Pecarsky v. Galaxiworld.com Ltd., 249 F.3d 167, 171 [52]*52(2d Cir.2001). Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we find Appellants’ claims to be meritless for substantially the reasons stated by the District Court. Accordingly, we AFFIRM its decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

316 F. App'x 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todtman-v-ashraf-ca2-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack