Todora v. Venice Golf Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Todora v. Venice Golf Ass'n

869 So. 2d 1232, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3878, 2004 WL 590787

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 2004

DocketNo. 2D02-4895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 869 So. 2d 1232 (Todora v. Venice Golf Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Todora v. Venice Golf Ass'n, 869 So. 2d 1232, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3878, 2004 WL 590787 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

James Todora, as Sarasota County-Property Appraiser, appeals the judgment awarding costs to Venice Golf Association, Inc. after the trial court entered judgment in favor of the Association in its action challenging its tax assessments for two years. The Property Appraiser appealed the underlying judgment in favor of the Association, and this court reversed, holding that the Association was not the proper party to challenge the assessments. James Todora v. Venice Golf Ass’n, Inc., 847 So.2d 577 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 860 So.2d 980 (Fla.2003). Because the judgment upon which the cost judgment is predicated has been reversed, the cost judgment cannot stand. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Geeting, 355 So.2d 819 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Fraser-Watson v. Maxim Healthcare Servs., 849 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Reversed.

NORTHCUTT and STRINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHATLEY, Judge.

James Todora, as Sarasota County-Property Appraiser, appeals the judgment awarding costs to Venice Golf Association, Inc. after the trial court entered judgment in favor of the Association in its action challenging its tax assessments for two years. The Property Appraiser appealed the underlying judgment in favor of the Association, and this court reversed, holding that the Association was not the proper party to challenge the assessments. James Todora v. Venice Golf Ass’n, Inc., 847 So.2d 577 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 860 So.2d 980 (Fla.2003). Because the judgment upon which the cost judgment is predicated has been reversed, the cost judgment cannot stand. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Geeting, 355 So.2d 819 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Fraser-Watson v. Maxim Healthcare Servs., 849 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Reversed.

NORTHCUTT and STRINGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

869 So. 2d 1232, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3878, 2004 WL 590787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todora-v-venice-golf-assn-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack