Toder v. State

269 S.W. 1043, 99 Tex. Crim. 337, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 148
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 11, 1925·No. No. 9252.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the Criminal District Court of Harris county of burglary, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. An inspection of the indictment, however, reveals that it fails to allege that it was the intention of the appellant in the burglary of said house to take therefrom corporeal personal property “without the consent” of the alleged owner. This is held in Treadwell v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App. 644, and Fox v. State, 61 Texas Crim. Rep. 544, to be a necessary allegation. The indictment is fatally defective and, although! no motion to quash or in arrest of judgment appears in the record, it is incumbent upon this court to decline to approve a judgment based upon a fundamentally defective indictment.

The judgment of the trial court will be reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toder v. State, 269 S.W. 1043, 99 Tex. Crim. 337, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 148 (Tex. 1925).

269 S.W. 1043 (Toder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Valdez
550 S.W.2d 88 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Culpepper v. State
16 S.W.2d 1095 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)